Kazakhstan
Topic
ODIHR Legal Reviews, Assessments
Variety of useful resources and tools prepared by ODIHR to support legal reform in OSCE participating States. It includes legal reviews of draft and exisiting national legislation and assessments of legislative process.
Opinions
Since ratifying the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the authorities of Kazakhstan have made significant efforts to facilitate the participation of persons with disabilities in the electoral process, including in terms of access to information and polling stations. At the same time, the Civil Code still stipulates that persons with intellectual and psychosocial disabilities shall be recognized by courts as legally incapable, which means that in such cases, a guardian will be appointed to undertake all transactions on their behalf. Once declared legally incapable, the Constitution of Kazakhstan and other relevant legislation prohibits the respective individuals from voting, standing for office, becoming members of election commissions or the civil service, or participating in public councils and local meetings or gatherings. This has significant repercussions for such individuals, including in relation to the exercise of their political rights. This approach is at odds with key international standards on the political rights of persons with disabilities, as set out, for example, in the above-mentioned UN Convention.
ОБСЕ / БДИПЧ приветствует инициативу Министерства юстиции Казахстана запросить международную экспертизу плана действий и Концепции реализации Административного процедурно-процессуального кодекса Казахстана и развитие института административной юстиции и административных процедур. Данная Концепция в некоторых аспектах отсылает к соответствующим международным стандартам, таким как Европейский кодекс надлежащего административного поведения. Тем не менее, некоторые аспекты Концепции должны быть разъяснены для обеспечения соответствия международным обязательствам и стандартам, включая регулирование компетенции государственного управления Казахстана в отдельном правовом акте и роль прокуроров в административных делах.
Comments
Summary: The Comments look at a Commentary prepared by the Supreme Court of Kazakhstan on the national Code of Judicial Ethics and analyze the compliance of both the Commentary and underlying Code with international human rights standards and OSCE commitments. While the Commentary’s attempts to interpret the provisions of the Code of Judicial Ethics are generally welcomed, the Comments also outline the differences between codes of ethics on the one hand, and disciplinary offences on the other, and stress that breaches of ethics codes should not lead to disciplinary sanctions. Moreover, the Comments, among others, raise concerns with respect to certain provisions that are unclear or that contain extensive instructions on how to behave off-duty, including as regards the way in which judges exercise their religious faith. Another of a total of seven main recommendations suggests that the Commentary to the Code be validated by a wide representation of judges in Kazakhstan. These Comments were prepared at the request of the Head of the OSCE Programme Office in Astana.
Notes
The purpose of this Urgent Comparative Note is primarily to provide an overview of relevant international and regional standards, recommendations and OSCE commitments with respect to the contemplated priorities for judicial reforms, in particular, in relation to the role and status of judges and protection of their independence, in respect of some aspects of the reform of criminal and civil proceedings and compliance with the right to a fair trial. The Urgent Comparative Note also seeks to offer useful guidance on the proposed priorities for judicial reform with the aim to inform the work of policy- and law-makers in the coming months, in particular when developing and discussing relevant legislation.
OSCE/ODIHR welcomes the request of the High Judicial Council of Kazakhstan for international expertise in relation to the international obligations and standards on governance models of judicial councils. OSCE/ODIHR hopes that this Note will provide further guidance on international human rights obligations and OSCE commitments with respect to judicial councils.
Ensuring the independence and impartiality of a court or tribunal is as much a matter of principle as it is a matter of management. In this sense, the management of the judiciary acquires relevance as a guarantee to protect independence and impartiality. It must be reiterated that the key purpose of judicial self-governing bodies, particularly judicial councils or similar independent bodies, is to safeguard the independence of the judiciary and of individual judges. To serve this purpose, judicial councils must themselves enjoy sufficient independence from the other branches of power in their work and decision-making.
Summary: In line with a request received from the Chairman of the High Council of Judges of Kazakhstan, the Note focuses on particular key aspects of disciplinary proceedings against judges, namely the relevant institutions conducting such proceedings, types of disciplinary action taken against judges, the impact of disciplinary proceedings on judges’ careers and appeals against decisions taken in such proceedings. When looking at these issues, the Note makes reference to key international principles such as the independence of the judiciary, other fair trial standards such as the right to be heard and the equality of arms, and the right to an effective remedy. Furthermore, the Note stresses that legal provisions on disciplinary proceedings against judges need to be formulated clearly and with adequate precision, and that the grounds on which they are based, and the ensuing sanctions need to be equally clear, and proportionate to the respective wrongdoing. In addition to outlining international standards, commentaries and case law, the Note also provides good practice examples from a large variety of different OSCE participating States, to showcase how relevant international human rights provisions have been transformed into domestic law.
Others
No documents
Legislation
Constitution
Variety of useful resources and tools prepared by ODIHR to support legal reform in OSCE participating States. It includes legal reviews of draft and exisiting national legislation and assessments of legislative process.
Most read documents
Legislation
Criminal codes
National legislative acts on a range of human dimension issues. It offers access to full-text documents, as well as summaries of and excerpts from national constitutions, primary and secondary legislation and case-law from across the OSCE region.
Most read documents
Legislation
Primary and Secondary
National legislative acts on a range of human dimension issues. It offers access to full-text documents, as well as summaries of and excerpts from national constitutions, primary and secondary legislation and case-law from across the OSCE region.
Most read documents
International standards
National legislative acts on a range of human dimension issues. It offers access to full-text documents, as well as summaries of and excerpts from national constitutions, primary and secondary legislation and case-law from across the OSCE region.
Most read documents
No documents
Case-law
Case law subline. Status of Ratification of the Main International Human Rights Treaties, Conventions and other instruments. International Case-law for selected topics.
National
No documents